Every Wednesday I offer tips for adulthood.
I’ve written before about how – on many of the world’s most pressing issues – most people sort neatly into one of two camps: Coke vs. Pepsi. Boxers vs. Briefs. Pet vs. Anti-pet.
In keeping with this concept, the Freakonomics blog linked yesterday to a fascinating post by a guy named Paul Graham about what he calls “managers vs. makers.”
On one side of the divide, you have a group of workers – usually managers – who divided their day into tiny bite-sized chunks and for whom meetings – even spontaneous ones – constitute the essence of their job. On the other side, you have what he calls “makers” – i.e. computer programmers, writers, artists – who need large blocks of time to carry out tasks and who find meetings onerous and inefficient because they cut into their productivity.
While the thrust of Graham’s article is to make each type more sensitive to the style/needs of the other sort of worker, figuring out which sort of worker you are before you embark on a career choice could also save you time and headaches down the road. (Trust me. I myself have a maker’s soul trapped in a manager’s body, which probably explains my own schizophrenic career choices along the way.)
To that end, here are five ways to figure out if you’re a maker or a manager:
1. Do you like working in increments of one hour or three hours? If one, you’re a manager. If three, you’re a maker. I have one friend who claims that she can be productive in 20 minutes. She is definitely a manager.
2. Does the prospect of a meeting fill you with anticipation or dread? My husband – the quintessential maker (he’s an academic) – hates going to meetings. Me? Despite being a writer, I love them. They’re social, they bring focus to the day and, most of all, they provide at least the possibility of getting something out the door (which, if you’re a writer/artist/fill-in-the-blank creative type is often elusive.)
3. Do you always have Outlook calendar open on your computer? And do you actually use it? If yes, you’re a manager. You like to schedule things. If no, you’re a maker.
4. Do you ever forget meetings? As Graham notes, one of the problems with meetings if you’re a maker is that you have to remember them. I don’t think I’ve ever forgotten a meeting in my life. But I know plenty of makers who get so caught up in whatever they are doing (I name no names) that they completely lose track of time.
5. Are you on twitter? All social networking requires that you spend a certain amount of your day away from whatever it is that you do. But Twitter – because it is so fast and furious – is the uber-managerial 2.0 tool. When used religiously, it forces you to constantly interrupt yourself to tweet an update about your life, mention an article, or react to breaking news.
How about you? Where do you fall on the manager/maker scale?
Oops, sorry. Gotta run. I have a meeting to get to…
July 29, 2009, 10:12 pm
Yes! This is completely right. Except I think you got #3 wrong. I’m a maker to my soul. Which is exactly the reason I use Outlook obsessively. It frees me, somewhat, from the dread that I feel trying to remember all the things that are going to disrupt my fragile productivity!
July 31, 2009, 10:37 am
I like the notion of a maker’s soul trapped in a manager’s body. But alas, what to do for those of us who feel we can’t be productive in a mere 20-minute segment and yet dread those lengthy un-scheduled days when we have nothing to do but focus on the task in hand!
July 12, 2010, 2:02 pm
July 12, 2010, 3:25 pm
July 13, 2010, 4:29 am
interesting post! i think i may be a manager… and thanks for the freakonomics blog link. I’m just starting to read the book now..
July 16, 2010, 10:58 pm
September 16, 2010, 3:44 pm
March 17, 2012, 5:08 am
September 22, 2017, 8:49 pm
January 13, 2019, 10:08 am